Re: ?: Cox vs QWEST

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Craig White
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list, m.jarvis
Subject: Re: ?: Cox vs QWEST
On Mon, 2006-02-13 at 16:12 -0700, Mark Jarvis wrote:
> I currently have TV & internet via Cox and phone via QWEST. Current
> situation:
>
> 1) There are cost advantages to getting all services from the same supplier.
>
> 2) I regularly see download speeds of 350+ to 700* KBytes/sec. (usually
> depending on the host site's speed) on Cox.
>
> 3) QWEST promises download speed of 1+ MByte/sec. (This doesn't sound
> correct to me--I thought that DSL was slower, but . . .)
>
> 4) While 500+ is NICE when grabbing a new ISO, it's not absolutely
> essential.
>
> 5) I currently have two boxen connected to a Linksys router which
> connects to a (non-cox provided) Toshiba DOCSIS cable "modem".
>
> 6) Location is N. Central Phx. (South of Northern).
>
> Any pertinent comments, suggestions, personal experiences, etc. would be
> appreciated.

----
I don't live all that far from you and my 'second' dad lives right off
central at Frier - the phone lines near his house seem to be noisy and
sometimes cause problems as there are many bundles of damaged wires
there.

Cox is faster, Qwest is probably a bit more reliable. You can use
bittorrent to get faster downloads of iso files.

Cox doesn't stomps many ports on dhcp/residential clients like
25/80/137-139 etc. while Qwest will pretty much let you do anything you
want with the bandwidth.

No clear cut winners as I see it. (I'm on Cox - it ain't necessarily
cheaper)

Craig

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss