--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Anybody notice the abundance of people holding on and still patching the
older 2.2 kernels? I've been rather curious about this for a while -- didn't
say much about it because I thought it was a fluke or something. Isn't the
existance of the 2.4 kernels saying that the experimental 2.3 kernels have
reached a stable version?
--=20
Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate
phoenix@psy.ed.asu.edu
http://tank.dyndns.org/presence
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see
http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7fF4bYp5mUsPGjjwRAtuHAKCBkqnl6vlf+vSLk2cV1TnMCZGniQCgnivC
9tnPcBO9HOWgXdKBpp59kb0=
=I3FX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6--
(text/plain)