--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hrmf... Guess I'm just too lacking in the versions of commercial distros --
only copies of RH and Slack I have are versions 6.2 and 7.0 respectively.
(not really interested in those distros -- an LFS system is all I need. =3D=
o)
As for the non-existant 2.5 series: why does it trouble you?
--=20
Thomas "Mondoshawan" Tate
phoenix@psy.ed.asu.edu
http://tank.dyndns.org/presence
On Thu, Aug 16, 2001 at 05:35:43PM -0700, Jim wrote:
> All of the new distros come with 2.4. I think it has gotten to the point=
of=20
> being nice and stable. What troubles me is that we havent seen a 2.5 ser=
ies=20
> yet.
>
> On Thursday 16 August 2001 16:58, you wrote:
> > Anybody notice the abundance of people holding on and still patching the
> > older 2.2 kernels? I've been rather curious about this for a while --
> > didn't say much about it because I thought it was a fluke or something.
> > Isn't the existance of the 2.4 kernels saying that the experimental 2.3
> > kernels have reached a stable version?
>=20
> ----------------------------------------
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; charset=3D"us-ascii";=20
> name=3D"Attachment: 1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Content-Description:=20
> ----------------------------------------
> ________________________________________________
> See http://PLUG.phoenix.az.us/navigator-mail.shtml if your mail doesn't p=
ost to the list quickly and you use Netscape to write mail.
>=20
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see
http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE7fI16Yp5mUsPGjjwRAv4VAKCzNifjhguLZ/iyN/daIyugFSbBvQCdGieM
rYF9ANoICHbjRSP4L/Osatw=
=R7T8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--