Sorry... who is CL?
On 2021-11-18 14:25, Michael Butash via PLUG-discuss wrote:
>>> You think CBS service is pricey compared to residential? I pay
> $79/mo for CBS for Internet only.
>
> Well, admittedly I've not looked at CBS service in a while, I switched
> from Cox to CL a few years ago when they implemented bandwidth caps,
> and never really looked back, but that pricing seems not too bad now.
> Someone probably realized folks were going elsewhere and decided to be
> more competitive, plus with them offering even gig rates over cable,
> 50mbps sounds like crap so they can sell it cheaper, but would
> probably still be adequate for me as that's about what I had on
> residential when I left cox years ago. My torrents might take a bit
> longer, but that's ok, and I don't have a house of kids (or even
> adults) all streaming netflix at the same time to need more.
>
> In the past, there was a significant drop in bandwidth for CBS from
> residential services that took it well over 100 bucks (closer to $200)
> to get a comparable CBS circuit, and because they've laxed a lot of
> the port restrictions over the years simply wasn't necessary outside
> maybe support to get someone out same-day if needed. Even when I
> worked for them I thought it was overpriced.
>
> I can't complain too much about CL other than lately congestion in the
> evenings I can quantify (which Cox would too), and 125mbps down for
> $55/mo is a win/win in my book over cox at half the bandwidth and
> paying some $25 more per month. In the few years I've been with them,
> I've had no hard outages either. I can still https to my firewall for
> vpn, all I really need. Something to be said for legacy 2-wire
> technology where available if you don't need 100's of mbps or gig
> rates (which most really still don't).
>
> -mb
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 1:28 PM <techlists@phpcoderusa.com> wrote:
>
>> You think CBS service is pricey compared to residential? I pay
>> $79/mo
>> for CBS for Internet only. I looked into residential a while ago
>> and
>> found that after that initial discount the cost of residential
>> service
>> for just Internet was about the same.
>>
>> The difference I found was T.V. channels. The packages differ.
>>
>> I may have hit my limit with running a server... may not need/want
>> to go
>> any further. Was satisfying to be able to be able to get things
>> running
>> though. Bind and Postfix/Dovecot where the challenges for me.
>> Especially
>> Postfix/Dovecot.
>>
>> On 2021-11-18 13:15, Michael Butash via PLUG-discuss wrote:
>>>>> I am told I can rent more static IPs... I assume I will need
>> some
>>> hardware to be able to accommodate more than 1 IP unless I am port
>>> forwarding to different boxes.
>>>
>>> Not really, just about any *nix-y system can accommodate that with
>> NAT
>>> as a firewall/router/gateway, whatever you want to call it, with
>> one
>>> ip or many. Even basic WRT-based systems ala netgear/linksys can
>> tend
>>> to handle this in theory with basic network iptables features.
>>> Probably best would be something like pfsync, which there is
>> plenty of
>>> cheap gateway hardware out there that can run it, or any older
>> (ie.
>>> cheap) enterprise firewalls.
>>>
>>> Old days the biggest reason for multiple ip's was SSL requiring
>> 1:1 IP
>>> to DNS binding, but this has gotten easier out of necessity with
>> use
>>> of Subject Alternative Names (SAN) as part of the certs. If you
>> need
>>> the same external port being forwarded to multiple internal
>>> ports/services is about the only other reason for multiple ip's,
>> but
>>> as long as you can define separate ports for what is connecting to
>> it,
>>> not so much.
>>>
>>> When you get to the point you want to do so, more than few of us
>> have
>>> probably done so to help you through it and understand the
>> concepts
>>> once you know what you need/want to do.
>>>
>>>>> Cox Business does not block any ports.
>>>
>>> The only residential ports they block really relevant these days
>> is 80
>>> for http (not 443/https, so why 80??), and smtp for email, but
>> these
>>> days there is little reason to run your own smtp server unless
>> you're
>>> just doing it to do it or honeypot spammers trying to hit you 24/7
>> for
>>> no good reasons. I'd run sslvpn for remote access on https/443
>> just
>>> fine on res service, I just need to make sure to type https://.
>>>
>>>>> I am satisfied with Cox Business
>>>
>>> CBS service is just pricey (compared to residential) to begin
>> with,
>>> unlimited bandwidth and unblocked ports or not imho, but otherwise
>>> about the best/cheapest "business class" service/support you can
>> get,
>>> if you can get it in your hood.
>>>
>>> -mb
>>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 12:04 PM Keith Smith via PLUG-discuss
>>> <plug-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've had a Cox Business account for maybe 8 years. I've only had
>>>> one
>>>> outage, and it was short. My package is a home office type of
>> plan.
>>>> I
>>>> am currently running a LAMP + BIND + Postfix + Dovecot on a
>> laptop
>>>> on my
>>>> single static IP. I am told I can rent more static IPs... I
>> assume
>>>> I
>>>> will need some hardware to be able to accommodate more than 1 IP
>>>> unless
>>>> I am port forwarding to different boxes.
>>>> I configured this server on a laptop to see if I could do it. I
>> am
>>>> a
>>>> PHP dev, with some light LAMP server experience. I still have a
>> lot
>>>> to
>>>> learn.
>>>>
>>>> Cox Business does not block any ports.
>>>>
>>>> Cox tells me there will never be any overages because on my plan
>> I
>>>> purchase a set up and down which cannot be exceeded.
>>>>
>>>> I am satisfied with Cox Business
>>>>
>>>> On 2021-11-14 11:21, Joe Neglia via PLUG-discuss wrote:
>>>>> Any recommendations for a reliable ISP?
>>>>>
>>>>> (Couldn't find any recent discussion in the PLUG archives, so am
>>>>> asking here.)
>>>>>
>>>>> I currently have a business account (I'm running a small server
>> on
>>>> a
>>>>> static public IP address for my business), but am having a
>>>> *terrible*
>>>>> time with my current ISP. Worked *great* for about a year, but
>>>> have
>>>>> been having daily outages for about a month now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't even want to say the name for fear of being sued for
>> libel.
>>>> They
>>>>> were honest enough to admit it is an "internal issue", and have
>> no
>>>> ETA
>>>>> on a fix. "[Their] technicians continue to work to resolve the
>>>>> problem in [my] neighborhood. Currently, there is no estimated
>>>> time
>>>>> for when service will be restored."
>>>>>
>>>>> I get the feeling they don't have a grasp on the problem, as
>> when
>>>> I
>>>>> call their status line they report an outage even when the
>> system
>>>> is
>>>>> up. When my connection goes down, a modem reboot sometimes (but
>>>> not
>>>>> always) gets me connected again.
>>>>>
>>>>> Speed is not an issue. But reliability is! Any suggestions
>> would
>>>> be
>>>>> greatly appreciated.
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
https://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss 
(text/plain)