With the exception of labor law violations what you have outlined has to do with business practices.
How can government improve these problems?
------------------------
Keith Smith
--- On Sat, 8/1/09, Michael Butash <
michael@butash.net> wrote:
> From: Michael Butash <michael@butash.net>
> Subject: Re: Geek/Tech/Entrepreneur Stuff to do in PHX
> To: "Main PLUG discussion list" <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> Date: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 10:31 PM
> Well, largely I agree with Joshua's
> assessment, sounds like his
> experience is much like mine...
>
> I moved to the Bay area in 99, worked tech there for 2
> years, moved back
> when things imploded in 01. Since being back versed
> with tech skill and
> corporate politics, I've only ever been able to describe
> most business
> in Arizona as bass-ackward and/or hot-air propelled.
> Largely I note
> Arizona seems to encourage abuse of fair labor standards
> act for
> salaried employees, resulting in a lot of "sweatshop IT"
> mentality in
> corporations here. Funny I heard mentioned godaddy
> and 2wire, as they
> tend to be some of the biggest offenders of running said
> sweat shops.
> Give your buddy 6 months at the Daddy to acclimate to them
> and ask what
> he thinks. :)
>
> When I did move back to AZ, I'd joined some professional
> "networking"
> groups like AZIPA that led to not much more than pedantic
> bickering and
> posturing, not much at all helpful for business or
> technology
> opportunities. Ultimately I saw it splinter,
> fracture, and a lot of
> people simply lose interest because of it, including
> myself. From that
> I found being an island unto yourself isn't always a bad
> thing, simply
> networking with people I met through work. Only
> recently have I
> somewhat opened up to professional networking though
> LinkedIn and user
> groups like this one, but really just to keep touch with
> associates and
> clients of mine. I'm still gun shy on the rest...
>
> Since being back in AZ, I've worked for a lot of IT shops
> and been
> exposed to a lot of people shifting between jobs, finding
> that more or
> less most corporate politics surrounding IT are the same,
> and not
> typically good. I worked 3 years at GoDaddy prior and
> through massive
> growth, while one of my best work experiences (building
> cool/expensive
> stuff), it was also one of the worst (meat grinder
> stressful workplace,
> implosive politics). GD and frankly a lot of
> companies I've been
> exposed to are more alike than not, typically because of
> clueless upper
> management and general lack of ethics, but somehow forge
> along despite
> themselves. Closest analogy I can equated it to
> universally is "the
> blind leading the blind", where self-serving politics,
> combined with
> poor technological leadership, and now volatile economics
> eventually
> dictate perspective reasoning of how things work. Bad
> things tend to
> result, and often...
>
> The difference between working in the Bay Area and in
> Arizona is stark.
> Generally I found a lot better talent there, with a
> stronger likeliness
> to embrace technology, and be passionate about their
> work. Here there's
> just a lot of people graduating DeVry, UoP, WIU, and other
> "schools"
> cranking out mediocre certified/degreed cannon-fodder for
> the local IT
> shops, trying to get paid by the IT dream job. It's
> almost scary
> walking into new customer businesses consulting anymore,
> pretty safe to
> assume someone knows nothing than anything about the tech
> they support.
> While I did have this too in the Bay Area, the clueless
> admin syndrome
> is a heck of a lot more prevalent here. Work ethics
> tend to be crappier
> too. I dunno, something in the water perhaps...
>
> Look around at the sheer number of call centers for
> businesses out of
> state we have here, and that should tell you
> something. A lot of
> low-pay, mediocre jobs, and a career path to become a
> cattle herder of
> these call centers, maybe even move into middle management
> if you're
> lucky. Businesses like GoDaddy, 2wire, CableOne, Cox,
> ETelecare, etc
> simply rotate people in and out like underwear, but they're
> the armpits
> that fund a lot of the IT business around town as well, as
> someone's got
> to support all the infrastructure to take those
> calls. Godaddy's call
> centers are slightly different because they actually MAKE
> them money, so
> they tend to commission merit pay and lavish gifts readily
> upon them to
> keep everyone happy, but it's still at the root just
> another sweatshop
> call center. Other call centers are much less
> forgiving...
>
> Supporting IT shops around call centers tends to be a
> double-edged
> sword, especially when the call center slave mentality
> pervades into the
> how companies deal with or even drive IT folk. Even
> non-call-centers
> seem to act this way locally more commonly than not, just
> because they
> can, and it's the atmosphere people are becoming acclimated
> to. As
> people migrate jobs, I think ultimately this pervasive
> mentality results
> in excessive overwork and general dissatisfaction, causing
> a
> trickle-down effect into other work places.
>
> These disinterested/jaded/overworked/underpaid workers now
> head out into
> other IT shops to maintain infrastructure over their head
> and
> undermanned, meaning things degrade eventually even if once
> deployed
> properly. I'm not at all certain if this is just a
> local thing, or the
> new national standard at work, but it seems much more
> pervasive here
> than certain other localities I work with.
> Professional ethics are hard
> to find these days in general with hard times indeed.
> Anyone else of
> hiring capacity notice try hiring *good* people these
> days? Pretty
> difficult if you ask me.
>
> Overall, working in the tech field here for the past 8
> years in a more
> senior capacity, I'm often uncertain I want to remain in AZ
> long-term.
> As I get older, my flame to set upon the world diminishes,
> I'll probably
> just wander until I feel comfortable for a bit. I
> love AZ, but I'm
> fairly disparaged by the business opportunities here after
> all these
> years...
>
> So enough hot-air of my own, take it as you will, but
> that's my take on
> things. Feel free to disagree. :)
>
> Good discussion indeed, interesting to hear other's
> opinions on the
> matter.
>
> -mb
>
>
> On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 19:08 -0700, Joshua Zeidner wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 6:50 PM, keith smith<klsmith2020@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I think what is really missing from this equation
> is mentoring and training.
> >
> > what I would like to see is some real
> support from AZ government to
> > help make tech companies feel welcome here. This
> means:
> >
> > 1) making the valley a good place not
> only to build a company but to
> > build a *career*. this means buy in from both
> sides of the equation.
> > I would like to see a bit more address at lower
> capital levels, but
> > that may prove to be difficult. It seems that
> most existing concepts
> > are kind of stuck in the industrial model, where you
> build a factory
> > in a place with low taxes and hire low wage workers,
> but technology
> > requires high wage workers who demand a good thriving
> job market. The
> > needs are quite different. The biggest issue
> with starting a company
> > out here is finding people. Where are all the
> people? in CA.
> > because it has a good job market. If we can
> outsource to India, we
> > sure as hell can outsource to Arizona.
> >
> > 2) setting up low cost legal
> structure and as you say mentoring to
> > really help stimulate technology development.
> We've seen (at least
> > nominal) efforts in the past. Why did they
> fail? This means real and
> > adequate assistance in bringing concepts to production
> and market. A
> > small investment in this area will yield returns in
> tax base and
> > property value by a factor of hundreds. Arizona
> has the potential to
> > pick up a lot of this commercial activity because
> California is
> > currently set to become a tax strapped nightmare state
> to build your
> > business. If AZ fails to see the opportunity
> here, we will lose out
> > big time. Currently the budget proceedings are
> still in gridlock.
> >
> > the mayor of Phoenix seems to have
> the right idea, he was suggesting
> > recently a green technology center near Phx
> center. I think thats the
> > direction AZ needs to go. -jmz
> >
> > >
> > > I like the idea that folks are getting together
> to network. This is a really cool idea. Even for
> non-technical stuff like finding out how people deal with
> customers, contracting, book-keeping, ETC.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ------------------------
> > > Keith Smith
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Sat, 8/1/09, Joshua Zeidner <jjzeidner@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Joshua Zeidner <jjzeidner@gmail.com>
> > >> Subject: Re: Geek/Tech/Entrepreneur Stuff to
> do in PHX
> > >> To: "Main PLUG discussion list" <plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
> > >> Date: Saturday, August 1, 2009, 6:08 PM
> > >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 11:09 PM,
> > >> Alan Dayley<alandd@consultpros.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Joshua,
> > >> >
> > >> > I put all your replies together in one
> long document
> > >> and reread them.
> > >> > I am still confused a bit.
> Enlightenment via email
> > >> rarely occurs.
> > >> > However, I really want to understand
> your position in
> > >> this discussion.
> > >> > Let me summarize what I understand
> from your
> > >> replies.
> > >> >
> > >> > ---[Start my paraphasing of your
> comments]---
> > >> >
> > >> > - There is a small group or groups of
> people who keep
> > >> spinning off
> > >> > communities using tired marketing
> techniques. This
> > >> results in blogs
> > >> > but not true communities.
> > >> >
> > >> > - Some of these people cannot deal with
> existing
> > >> structure and the
> > >> > efforts of the past.
> > >> >
> > >> > - These weak attempts do not articulate
> goals or
> > >> purpose well, if at all.
> > >> >
> > >> > - We must honestly look at criticism to
> learn and
> > >> improve.
> > >> >
> > >> > - These weak people need to address the
> efforts of the
> > >> past and
> > >> > provide suggestions on how they can be
> improved upon.
> > >> >
> > >> > - Getting political support will provide
> legitimacy to
> > >> their efforts.
> > >> >
> > >> > - Phoenix will attract technology
> businesses because
> > >> of the relative
> > >> > low cost and this will help improve
> things.
> > >> >
> > >> > - You have first hand experiences of
> weak, marketing
> > >> fronted,
> > >> > community building efforts.
> > >> >
> > >> > - Many 'entrepreneurs' have grand ideas
> but get
> > >> nowhere with them
> > >> > because they are not real businesses.
> > >> >
> > >> > - People at a co-working location or
> coffee shop will
> > >> not help you
> > >> > with your business unless you pay them.
> > >> >
> > >> > - Most people at co-working started
> their one person
> > >> business after
> > >> > being laid-off and are not serious about
> it. They
> > >> are really just
> > >> > looking for the next full time
> gig. This will get in
> > >> your way if you
> > >> > have real business work to do.
> > >> >
> > >> > - We must look truthfully at this issue
> if we are to
> > >> make progress.
> > >> >
> > >> > - There are no serious incubators and
> entrepreneurial
> > >> meetups in
> > >> > Phoenix. No announcements on VC
> funding of companies
> > >> so it's not
> > >> > really entrepreneurial growth.
> > >> >
> > >> > ---[End my paraphrasing of your
> comments]---
> > >> >
> > >> > I see validity in every one of these
> comments. I
> > >> also think many of
> > >> > them can be balanced by the other point
> of view. I
> > >> still have
> > >> > questions, if I may ask, before I state
> too much of my
> > >> own thinking.
> > >> > I want to learn more about your
> thinking.
> > >> >
> > >> > 1. What does "deal with existing
> structure" mean?
> > >> This confuses me,
> > >> > not know what structure you are talking
> about.
> > >>
> > >> Many user groups have been
> formed and continue to
> > >> exist... how is
> > >> <groupX> different? other than
> its led by
> > >> person Y? I mean dealing
> > >> with some of these groups I feel like Im back
> to age 8
> > >> trying to gain
> > >> admittance into the neighborhood
> treehouse. Perhaps I
> > >> should spend
> > >> more time drinking beer with these
> people? Seeing the
> > >> same small
> > >> group churning out 'communities' is at first
> funny, then
> > >> annoying. I
> > >> just see a real lack of serious intent, and
> unless that is
> > >> noted
> > >> publicly, it makes all of us look bad.
> I really dont
> > >> think Im being
> > >> destructive or malicious here, Im pointing
> out some valid
> > >> observations.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > 2. To what efforts of the past are you
> referring? I
> > >> want to
> > >> > understand the size and nature of
> efforts to creating
> > >> a community that
> > >> > you feel were legitimate but perhaps did
> not work as
> > >> planned.
> > >>
> > >> I remember when I first came
> to AZ that there was an
> > >> tech
> > >> incubator... what happened to it?
> Which
> > >> political agents currently
> > >> support technology development in the
> valley? what do
> > >> they think
> > >> about your org? these things are pretty
> basic...
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > 3. What political support is
> needed? You mean
> > >> government funding of
> > >> > events or startups or just verbal
> support or what?
> > >>
> > >> I wouldn't expect funding,
> but it would be good to
> > >> see some
> > >> political buy in. Lack of just supports
> my opinions,
> > >> that its really
> > >> as Lisa said, camouflage for poor
> organization.
> > >> Without any good
> > >> signposts, all this will produce are people
> who get jaded
> > >> and
> > >> disaffected with regards to this
> location. If you had
> > >> something
> > >> together I doubt that a good politician would
> turn you
> > >> down.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > 4. Why is it wrong or a problem for
> someone who is
> > >> laid-off to have
> > >> > grand ideas, talk about them and they
> never come to
> > >> be?
> > >>
> > >> Its not. As I said, I
> don't find any of these
> > >> things highly
> > >> offensive- but like you I am free to express
> myself.
> > >> Sorry if its not
> > >> filled with abundant exaltations.
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > 5. Is it not conceivable that people
> might help each
> > >> other in business
> > >> > efforts? Isn't strengthening and
> creating such a
> > >> culture a good idea
> > >> > or should such a goal not be pursued
> because it is not
> > >> practically
> > >> > possible?
> > >>
> > >> sure. good thread
> btw. -jmz
> > >>
> > >> >
> > >> > Alan
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:20 PM, Joshua
> Zeidner<jjzeidner@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >> another great one:
> > >> >>
> > >> >> "OK, my question stands. Where are
> the incubators,
> > >> the "bootstrap"
> > >> >> seminars, the serious
> entrepreneurial meetups in
> > >> Phoenix??? (crickets
> > >> >> chirping). Phoenix just ain't
> happening as a
> > >> serious place where
> > >> >> serious people are doing serious
> things. No one
> > >> wants it badly enough
> > >> >> here. This paper should be having at
> least one
> > >> article a week on a new
> > >> >> startup and the VC firm who funded
> it.
> > >> Helloooo????? is anybody out
> > >> >> there...."
> > >> >>
> > >> >> a better way to phrase this: we need
> to stop
> > >> pretending these
> > >> >> whimsical efforts churned out by
> local
> > >> self-employed marketing experts
> > >> >> are sufficient. They are
> not. We should be
> > >> asking the hard
> > >> >> questions, not playing games.
> > >> >>
> > >> >> -jmz
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 4:04 PM,
> Joshua
> > >> Zeidner<jjzeidner@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>> another point, honestly
> reading through some
> > >> of the criticisms on
> > >> >>> azcentral and being of the cafe
> dwelling creed
> > >> myself, I'd have to say
> > >> >>> that many of those points are
> accurate. I've
> > >> heard lots of
> > >> >>> 'entrepreneurs' with big ideas
> around here who
> > >> never get anywhere with
> > >> >>> them. Sorry, but a word
> press template
> > >> doesn't make you an
> > >> >>> entrepreneur.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> "These are the same people
> you see at
> > >> Starbucks, Boarders or any
> > >> >>> other wi-fi hot spot, they are
> not
> > >> entrepreneurs they are attention
> > >> >>> (inappropriate term)."
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> "Many of the Co-Worker
> location founders
> > >> tout other people to
> > >> >>> collaborate with and who can
> "compensate for
> > >> your deficiencies". Do
> > >> >>> you really believe someone that
> you are not
> > >> paying as an employee is
> > >> >>> going to somehow compensate for
> your
> > >> deficiencies and make your
> > >> >>> business better? That kind of
> help doesn't
> > >> come without a price."
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> oh so true...
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> "You are more likely to
> get a bunch of
> > >> people chatting to you over
> > >> >>> your "work" so you wont be
> concentrating as
> > >> you should to focus on
> > >> >>> your business. Most of these
> people started
> > >> businesses after being
> > >> >>> laid off. They are searching for
> a new job and
> > >> they aren't really
> > >> >>> serious about their "businesses"
> so how do you
> > >> expect them to give you
> > >> >>> valuable, serious advice. Are
> these the kind
> > >> of people you need to
> > >> >>> compensate for your
> deficiencies? A bunch of
> > >> people half-as running
> > >> >>> their "business" while searching
> for a real
> > >> job and bothering you with
> > >> >>> their expertise that got them
> laid off in the
> > >> first place."
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> oh so so true...
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> I would be willing to bet
> the commenter
> > >> above is an tried and true
> > >> >>> successful entrepreneur.
> Perhaps the reason
> > >> I am so skeptical is
> > >> >>> because I know these kind of
> people so well.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> sorry I really wish I
> could be more
> > >> supportive... but : truth is
> > >> >>> the foundation of progress.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> -jmz
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:28 PM,
> Joshua
> > >> Zeidner<jjzeidner@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>> Alan,
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> Wish I had time
> to respond to all
> > >> these points right now, not sure
> > >> >>>> you read me the way I would
> prefer
> > >> however. Its not so grave a
> > >> >>>> warning, just getting the
> word out on my
> > >> first hand experiences. Im
> > >> >>>> just one of many- but
> hopefully an
> > >> impartial observer and someone
> > >> >>>> genuinely concerned for AZ.
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> all the best, jmz
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 3:12
> PM, Alan
> > >> Dayley<alandd@consultpros.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>> Josh,
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> I feel warned. And
> I don't
> > >> understand the reason for such a strong
> warning.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> There are people in
> every industry,
> > >> government or community who wish
> > >> >>>>> to fleece their
> "community" for their
> > >> own profit instead of mutual
> > >> >>>>> benefit. The trick
> is to find the
> > >> positive people and ignore the
> > >> >>>>> rest. Apply the
> same filter with
> > >> every event, group or blogger in the
> > >> >>>>> lists and links I
> provided. I don't
> > >> expect bloggers or techies to be
> > >> >>>>> any different, as if
> being techie
> > >> makes one a saint.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Some of those bloggers
> are purely
> > >> commercial or completely neglected,
> > >> >>>>> I'm sure. Some of
> the groups or
> > >> events or sites listed are lousy,
> > >> >>>>> boring or poor marketing
> excuses to
> > >> sell something. Some are not out
> > >> >>>>> to create community but
> to build a
> > >> "kingdom" for their own benefit.
> > >> >>>>> They are the duds.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Let's look at a few
> positives:
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - Read the Gangplank
> Manifesto on
> > >> their home page at
> > >> >>>>> http://gangplankhq.com. That looks like
> > >> a great articulation of their
> > >> >>>>> goals and purpose.
> Ones I strongly
> > >> support!
> > >> >>>>> -- Read how the
> manifesto came to be
> > >> on Derek's blog at
> > >> >>>>> http://derekneighbors.com/2009/07/collaborative-writing-or-how-the-gangplank-manifesto-was-written/
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - Gangplank has hosted
> or is hosting:
> > >> >>>>> -- MobiFest - a day long
> conference on
> > >> developing for phones like
> > >> >>>>> iPhone or Android
> > >> >>>>> -- Gangplank Jr. - a 2-3
> hour Saturday
> > >> event for kids 5-15 to learn
> > >> >>>>> programming concepts
> > >> >>>>> -- Wordpress training
> classes for
> > >> minimal cost or no-cost for non-profit orgs
> > >> >>>>> -- Laid Off Camp - a day
> long
> > >> conference on job searching and
> entreprenuership
> > >> >>>>> -- Barcamp Pheonix - a
> day long
> > >> conference on software development
> > >> >>>>> -- TEDx night - Watch
> ted.com videos
> > >> and discuss them
> > >> >>>>> -- OpenPhoenix - a night
> of open mic
> > >> music and entertainment
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - The last http://desertcodecamp.com/ was held on June 13th and
> > >> nearly
> > >> >>>>> filled DeVry's Phoenix
> campus with
> > >> developers talking about code or
> > >> >>>>> making code. Free
> lunch of pizza and
> > >> sub sandwiches was provided too.
> > >> >>>>> Put together by
> volunteers.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - If you're into
> Microsoft based
> > >> development tech, the people who
> > >> >>>>> maintain the http://azgroups.com site do an annual all-day event at
> > >> >>>>> venues like the Orphium
> Theater and at
> > >> no cost to attendees. Fine,
> > >> >>>>> it's marketing for MS
> but it's put on
> > >> by volunteers here in the valley
> > >> >>>>> and a great way for
> people to learn
> > >> about things that improve their
> > >> >>>>> career skills.
> > >> >>>>> (http://www.componentart.com/BLOGS/milos/archive/2009/06/02/scott-guthrie-event-2009-phoenix-az.aspx)
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - The local Ruby On
> Rails group has
> > >> monthly meetings with around 30
> > >> >>>>> regularly in
> attendance.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - The Java group is also
> well attended
> > >> every month.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - The third http://podcampaz.com/ is coming up in November, put on
> > >> by
> > >> >>>>> voluteers at no cost
> (donation
> > >> requested) to attendees. Had about 350
> > >> >>>>> people attend last year
> (if I recall)
> > >> for two days of conference.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - The http://azentrepreneurship.com/ conference will be in
> > >> November
> > >> >>>>> for the forth
> year. This one costs
> > >> $100+ but should be as well
> > >> >>>>> attended as last year
> with 200+
> > >> people. Funded and organized in part
> > >> >>>>> by a local venture
> capital group.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - The first http://ignitephoenix.com event was held a year ago
> with
> > >> a
> > >> >>>>> little over 100 in
> attendance and has
> > >> grown to fill the 600 seat
> > >> >>>>> Theather at Tempe Center
> for the Arts
> > >> back in June. The connections
> > >> >>>>> made there live well
> past the event.
> > >> >>>>> -- Oh, a city council
> member and the
> > >> mayor of Tempe spoke this last
> > >> >>>>> time, though he was a
> bit silly trying
> > >> to be Tempe exclusive. That
> > >> >>>>> seems to be at least
> verbal political
> > >> support.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> - The second ABLEConf on
> FS/OSS is
> > >> being planned for October and
> > >> >>>>> should be better than
> last year. (Go
> > >> Hans and team!)
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> I'm not going to go on,
> though I could
> > >> point out several purely social
> > >> >>>>> events like http://phoenixfridaynights.com/, it's east and west
> > >> valley
> > >> >>>>> analogs, East Valley
> Thursday Morning
> > >> breakfasts, Tempe Geeks Lunch,
> > >> >>>>> South Valley Geek Meet
> and Eat and
> > >> Gangplank's Brown Gag lunch
> > >> >>>>> presentations every
> Wednesday.
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Now, having said all of
> that "giddy
> > >> blind optimism," I'd like to
> > >> >>>>> understand how the above
> does not
> > >> address the efforts of the past or
> > >> >>>>> provide improvement over
> past efforts.
> > >> What are the real needs of the
> > >> >>>>> community, if not some
> of the above?
> > >> What would you suggest? How can
> > >> >>>>> PLUG be a part of it?
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> Alan
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at
> 1:34 PM,
> > >> Joshua Zeidner<jjzeidner@gmail.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> >>>>>> Alan,
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> while I
> appreciate your post,
> > >> and anyone who is making a sincere
> > >> >>>>>> effort to build
> community in
> > >> Phoenix... be warned. There are some
> > >> >>>>>> small groups who
> periodically
> > >> spawn off new 'communities' every month
> > >> >>>>>> or so. Look
> closely and you see
> > >> the same few people with reused
> > >> >>>>>> marketing
> recipes. Lots of blog
> > >> and not too much community I'm
> > >> >>>>>> afraid. Their
> efforts amount to
> > >> some simple branding and putting up a
> > >> >>>>>> blog. While
> these things are not
> > >> really particularily offensive to
> > >> >>>>>> me, they do somewhat
> detract from
> > >> interest in the real needs of the
> > >> >>>>>> community
> here. Some of these
> > >> people are just outright idiotic and
> > >> >>>>>> cannot deal with
> existing
> > >> structure and refuse to accept the history
> > >> >>>>>> of efforts in the
> past. They
> > >> lack any articulation of their goals and
> > >> >>>>>> purpose. Often
> times they have
> > >> trouble organizing even small groups
> > >> >>>>>> of 2 or 3.
> Dont forget we've had
> > >> a tech incubator here. Lets not
> > >> >>>>>> smack down sincere
> criticism in
> > >> favor of giddy blind optimism,
> > >> >>>>>> remember you can't
> improve without
> > >> criticism. I would take these
> > >> >>>>>> people much more
> seriously if they
> > >> addressed the efforts of the past
> > >> >>>>>> and perhaps
> suggested how they are
> > >> going to improve on them, or
> > >> >>>>>> perhaps indicate
> what has changed
> > >> that will make them a success.
> > >> >>>>>> Maybe seeking real
> political
> > >> support would gain some legitimacy.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> on the
> positive side, I think
> > >> Phoenix will attract a lot of
> > >> >>>>>> technology business
> due to its
> > >> relative low cost and no doubt you will
> > >> >>>>>> start to see
> community
> > >> infrastructure grow. We are seeing some
> real
> > >> >>>>>> urban development
> happening in Phx
> > >> metro which has me very excited. I
> > >> >>>>>> think when the
> macroeconomic
> > >> problems are sorted out we will see
> > >> >>>>>> downtown Phx
> bloom. Im hoping
> > >> that the average Arizonan gets involved
> > >> >>>>>> in the political
> process and make
> > >> sure that the corruption stays out
> > >> >>>>>> of city and state
> politics.
> > >> Coming from NY, Im recognizing a lot
> of
> > >> >>>>>> positive development
> trends in Phx
> > >> metro.
> > >> >>>>>>
> > >> >>>>>> -jmz
> > >> >>>>>
> > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > >> >>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing
> list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > >> >>>>> To subscribe,
> unsubscribe, or to
> > >> change your mail settings:
> > >> >>>>> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > >> >>>>>
> > >> >>>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>
> > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > >> >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > >> >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to
> change your mail
> > >> settings:
> > >> >> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > >> >>
> > >> >
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > >> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > >> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change
> your mail
> > >> settings:
> > >> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > >> >
> > >>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your
> mail
> > >> settings:
> > >> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> ---------------------------------------------------
> > > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail
> settings:
> > > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> > >
> > ---------------------------------------------------
> > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail
> settings:
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail
> settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)