I've been happy with CentOS for the last year or two.
"CentOS is an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution derived from sources
freely provided to the public by a prominent North American Enterprise
Linux vendor. CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendors
redistribution policy and aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS
mainly changes packages to remove upstream vendor branding and artwork.)"
http://www.centos.org/
Nathan England wrote:
> I don't need the support from RH as I have the PLUG!
> But I do need updates and such, so for now we are using FC5 but I want to move
> to something with a little more future, as it was recently shown we can't
> trust the legacy project!
>
> On Wednesday 20 September 2006 14:55, Gerard J Snitselaar wrote:
>
>> On 0, Nathan England <nathan@paysonlinux.org> wrote:
>>
>>> All,
>>>
>>> I'm interested in an Enterprise roundup, what distro you use in an
>>> enterprise environment and what it is you like about it.
>>>
>> We ship RHEL on our systems, along with our fault tolerance stuff.
>> Originally there was work being done to ship SLES, but that has fallen to
>> the side for the time being. I think the switch to RH was basically because
>> that is what customers wanted. While RH tries to only do security updates
>> and such for a particular release they do occasionally allow changes to
>> creep in that cause interface changes. I am guessing the main difference
>> between RHEL and CentOS is that you have a support contract with RH? I
>> don't mind RH as I have used it and FC along with many other distributions
>> over the years.
>>
>
>
--
JD Austin
Twin Geckos Technology Services LLC
email:
jd@twingeckos.com
http://www.twingeckos.com
phone/fax: 480.288.8195
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)