I've been happy with CentOS for the last year or two. "CentOS is an Enterprise-class Linux Distribution derived from sources freely provided to the public by a prominent North American Enterprise Linux vendor. CentOS conforms fully with the upstream vendors redistribution policy and aims to be 100% binary compatible. (CentOS mainly changes packages to remove upstream vendor branding and artwork.)" http://www.centos.org/ Nathan England wrote: > I don't need the support from RH as I have the PLUG! > But I do need updates and such, so for now we are using FC5 but I want to move > to something with a little more future, as it was recently shown we can't > trust the legacy project! > > On Wednesday 20 September 2006 14:55, Gerard J Snitselaar wrote: > >> On 0, Nathan England wrote: >> >>> All, >>> >>> I'm interested in an Enterprise roundup, what distro you use in an >>> enterprise environment and what it is you like about it. >>> >> We ship RHEL on our systems, along with our fault tolerance stuff. >> Originally there was work being done to ship SLES, but that has fallen to >> the side for the time being. I think the switch to RH was basically because >> that is what customers wanted. While RH tries to only do security updates >> and such for a particular release they do occasionally allow changes to >> creep in that cause interface changes. I am guessing the main difference >> between RHEL and CentOS is that you have a support contract with RH? I >> don't mind RH as I have used it and FC along with many other distributions >> over the years. >> > > -- JD Austin Twin Geckos Technology Services LLC email: jd@twingeckos.com http://www.twingeckos.com phone/fax: 480.288.8195