I don't need the support from RH as I have the PLUG!
But I do need updates and such, so for now we are using FC5 but I want to move
to something with a little more future, as it was recently shown we can't
trust the legacy project!
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 14:55, Gerard J Snitselaar wrote:
> On 0, Nathan England <nathan@paysonlinux.org> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I'm interested in an Enterprise roundup, what distro you use in an
> > enterprise environment and what it is you like about it.
>
> We ship RHEL on our systems, along with our fault tolerance stuff.
> Originally there was work being done to ship SLES, but that has fallen to
> the side for the time being. I think the switch to RH was basically because
> that is what customers wanted. While RH tries to only do security updates
> and such for a particular release they do occasionally allow changes to
> creep in that cause interface changes. I am guessing the main difference
> between RHEL and CentOS is that you have a support contract with RH? I
> don't mind RH as I have used it and FC along with many other distributions
> over the years.
--
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Nathan England
PaysonLinux User Group
nathan@paysonlinux.org
http://www.paysonlinux.org/
Software Development
Website Development
Linux Administration
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)