I don't need the support from RH as I have the PLUG! But I do need updates and such, so for now we are using FC5 but I want to move to something with a little more future, as it was recently shown we can't trust the legacy project! On Wednesday 20 September 2006 14:55, Gerard J Snitselaar wrote: > On 0, Nathan England wrote: > > All, > > > > I'm interested in an Enterprise roundup, what distro you use in an > > enterprise environment and what it is you like about it. > > We ship RHEL on our systems, along with our fault tolerance stuff. > Originally there was work being done to ship SLES, but that has fallen to > the side for the time being. I think the switch to RH was basically because > that is what customers wanted. While RH tries to only do security updates > and such for a particular release they do occasionally allow changes to > creep in that cause interface changes. I am guessing the main difference > between RHEL and CentOS is that you have a support contract with RH? I > don't mind RH as I have used it and FC along with many other distributions > over the years. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Nathan England PaysonLinux User Group nathan@paysonlinux.org http://www.paysonlinux.org/ Software Development Website Development Linux Administration --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss