I don't need the support from RH as I have the PLUG!
But I do need updates and such, so for now we are using FC5 but I want to move
to something with a little more future, as it was recently shown we can't
trust the legacy project!
On Wednesday 20 September 2006 14:55, Gerard J Snitselaar wrote:
On 0, Nathan England <nathan@paysonlinux.org> wrote:
All,
I'm interested in an Enterprise roundup, what distro you use in an
enterprise environment and what it is you like about it.
We ship RHEL on our systems, along with our fault tolerance stuff.
Originally there was work being done to ship SLES, but that has fallen to
the side for the time being. I think the switch to RH was basically because
that is what customers wanted. While RH tries to only do security updates
and such for a particular release they do occasionally allow changes to
creep in that cause interface changes. I am guessing the main difference
between RHEL and CentOS is that you have a support contract with RH? I
don't mind RH as I have used it and FC along with many other distributions
over the years.