Well,
given historical perspective, yeah.
It was roosevelt who got us involved in WWII, and it was johnson who
wouldn't leave well enough alone for viet nam.
as for 9/11, that may have been a bit more complex from that standpoint.
anyway, someone else on the list requested this discussion either end
or be taken off list, so I am going to shut up now.
On 9/24/08, Nathan <
nathan@paysonlinux.org> wrote:
> On Wednesday 24 September 2008 05:31:49 Technomage Hawke wrote:
> > its just that I get rather a bit irked when someone comes out with a
> > new conspiracy theory. call it an exposed nerve for me.
>
> I tend to call it an inability to believe our government is capable of doing
> such a thing. Whether you believe it or not, you cannot deny the possibility.
> After all, if would _not_ be the first time in this countries presidential
> history they allowed us to be attacked to provoke the people into approval of
> a war. Conspiracy theories may be wack job ideas, but complete dismissal of
> some one elses views is just as dangerous.
>
>
> nathan
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)