Well, given historical perspective, yeah. It was roosevelt who got us involved in WWII, and it was johnson who wouldn't leave well enough alone for viet nam. as for 9/11, that may have been a bit more complex from that standpoint. anyway, someone else on the list requested this discussion either end or be taken off list, so I am going to shut up now. On 9/24/08, Nathan wrote: > On Wednesday 24 September 2008 05:31:49 Technomage Hawke wrote: > > its just that I get rather a bit irked when someone comes out with a > > new conspiracy theory. call it an exposed nerve for me. > > I tend to call it an inability to believe our government is capable of doing > such a thing. Whether you believe it or not, you cannot deny the possibility. > After all, if would _not_ be the first time in this countries presidential > history they allowed us to be attacked to provoke the people into approval of > a war. Conspiracy theories may be wack job ideas, but complete dismissal of > some one elses views is just as dangerous. > > > nathan > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss