Re: 386 vs 686 kernels

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Kevin
Date:  
To: PLUG-DISCUSS
Subject: Re: 386 vs 686 kernels
On 5/17/06 12:04 AM, "Dazed_75" <> wrote:

> 1) Is there any drawback to upgrading my Ubuntu 5.10 (or 6,x soon) to
> using a 686 version of the kernel?


There is no disadvantage. You should use the kernel that most closely
matches your actual hardware for best performance.

> 2) Is there any good reason for a package manager like Synaptic NOT to
> recognize and suggest the possible upgrade?


By default, Ubuntu uses a basic 386 kernel for increased hardware
compatibility "out-of-the-box" without adding all the possible kernels to
the installer. At one time, there was an note on their website that did a
nice job explaining this. I can't find it now.

...Kevin




---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss