RE: 386 vs 686 kernels

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Wagner, Steven G
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: RE: 386 vs 686 kernels
Why not learn Gentoo? Spare a weekend, feed your soul. It's good for you!

All your portage are owned by gentoo! You will LOVE emerge!

-----Original Message-----
From:
[mailto:plug-discuss-bounces@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us]On Behalf Of
Dazed_75
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 12:05 AM
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: 386 vs 686 kernels


I do understand what the basic difference is between the 386 and 686
versions of the kernel and would expect that the 686 kernel would be
an advantage with my P4 3 Ghz machine (actually for any machine with a
newer than 386 processor). My question though is twofold:

1) Is there any drawback to upgrading my Ubuntu 5.10 (or 6,x soon) to
using a 686 version of the kernel?

2) Is there any good reason for a package manager like Synaptic NOT to
recognize and suggest the possible upgrade?

--

Nothing is really work unless you would rather be doing something else.
- James M. Barrie
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/340 - Release Date: 5/15/2006

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.6/340 - Release Date: 5/15/2006

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss