>>I'm not certain that it is a true sweeping lack of access. Yes a few
>>members have pointed out that they cannot access the site and this needs
>>to be remedied. I don't know what steps have been taken to deal with
>>this other than to make sure the people in question were making it to
>>the site provider's network.
>
I demonostrated a 50% failure rate to connect using accounts from
Oregon, UK, Dallas, AZ, etc.
>
> Hypothesis: A significant number of web accounts are unable to directly access
> the PLUG website.
>
> Extension: Those web accounts that cannot directly access the PLUG website are
> disproportionately using high speed internet access.
One "account" that failed to connect was a co-lo facility.
>
> ---
>
> Null Hypothesis: The number of web accounts unable to directly access the PLUG
> website is statistically insignificant.
50% is highly significant... statistically my methodology was poor as I
only tried from 8 different "vectors".
>
> ====================
>
> There is plausible reason to suspect the hypothesis is true.
>
> Do we need to demonstrate that the hypothesis is true?
>
> How do we test the hypothesis? (It would seem to require some sort of random
> sampling.)
I have traceroutes from all 8 attempts, previously emailed to the list.
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)