Am 31. Jan, 2005 schwätzte June Tate so:
> On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 17:44 -0700, Mikey wrote:
> > Well, I would say that THIS disqualifies it for being an installfest distro.
> > And I had such high hopes!
> > Mepis all the way.
>
> Why is it that the fact that the LiveCD version doesn't have the ability
> to install disqualifies it from the installfest? The LiveCD was built
> with the idea of being a Knoppix-like CD -- not something that's meant
> to be installed.
Well, it disqualifies the LiveCD :), but that doesn't disqualify Ubuntu,
IMO. As I said before, I think the LiveCD is a great feature. If the two
differ a lot it might detract from how much use the LiveCD is, though.
> In the stamped CDs (and downloadable ISOs) of Warty, Canonical provided
> a set of two CDs: a LiveCD (the one you downloaded), and the installer
> CD. The LiveCD was meant to test Ubuntu on as many different machines as
> possible and to try out the distribution before installing it to be sure
> that it was something you wanted. The installer, however, was meant to
> be used for installation to the hard drive.
>
> So... if you'll excuse the pun... where's the beef? =o)
Please, we're always PC here. "Where's the vegetable enhanced tofu protein
suppliment"? :)
> > I think a distribution that is easy to install needs to be a requirement.
Actually, ease of installation is almost irrelevant. That's why we're
helping. If the install requires arcane knowledge and some holy water it
doesn't really matter. The key is that we have a solid, stable, functional
install when people take the box back home.
Ease of installation is a good feature, but there are more important
features for us.
ciao,
der.hans
--
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.AZOTO.org/
# veni, vidi, wiki - I came, I saw, I documented
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)