Am 31. Jan, 2005 schwätzte June Tate so: > On Sun, 2005-01-30 at 17:44 -0700, Mikey wrote: > > Well, I would say that THIS disqualifies it for being an installfest distro. > > And I had such high hopes! > > Mepis all the way. > > Why is it that the fact that the LiveCD version doesn't have the ability > to install disqualifies it from the installfest? The LiveCD was built > with the idea of being a Knoppix-like CD -- not something that's meant > to be installed. Well, it disqualifies the LiveCD :), but that doesn't disqualify Ubuntu, IMO. As I said before, I think the LiveCD is a great feature. If the two differ a lot it might detract from how much use the LiveCD is, though. > In the stamped CDs (and downloadable ISOs) of Warty, Canonical provided > a set of two CDs: a LiveCD (the one you downloaded), and the installer > CD. The LiveCD was meant to test Ubuntu on as many different machines as > possible and to try out the distribution before installing it to be sure > that it was something you wanted. The installer, however, was meant to > be used for installation to the hard drive. > > So... if you'll excuse the pun... where's the beef? =o) Please, we're always PC here. "Where's the vegetable enhanced tofu protein suppliment"? :) > > I think a distribution that is easy to install needs to be a requirement. Actually, ease of installation is almost irrelevant. That's why we're helping. If the install requires arcane knowledge and some holy water it doesn't really matter. The key is that we have a solid, stable, functional install when people take the box back home. Ease of installation is a good feature, but there are more important features for us. ciao, der.hans -- # https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.AZOTO.org/ # veni, vidi, wiki - I came, I saw, I documented --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss