On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 12:37, Vaughn Treude wrote:
> On Friday 14 May 2004 13:01, you wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 May 2004 08:28:36 -0700, George Gambill
> >
> > <ggambill@computer-guidance.com> wrote:
> > > Why RH 8 over RH 9?
> >
> > 9 was a bit rushed, a Friday build right before they decided on splitting
> > to Enterprise and Fedora.
>
> I've had a number of problems with RH9 in the stability area. It was kind of
> hard to be sure, because I had a bad memory stick (I think) that was causing
> me sporadic interrupts. Still, RH9 for me was prone to lockups. Are lockups
> part of it's bad reputation?
----
the only lockups I recalled were upgrading from earlier RH version which
made me toss away ~/.kde to clean up settings for KDE - not too certain
that it was truly an RH 9 problem.
Craig
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)