On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 12:37, Vaughn Treude wrote: > On Friday 14 May 2004 13:01, you wrote: > > On Fri, 14 May 2004 08:28:36 -0700, George Gambill > > > > wrote: > > > Why RH 8 over RH 9? > > > > 9 was a bit rushed, a Friday build right before they decided on splitting > > to Enterprise and Fedora. > > I've had a number of problems with RH9 in the stability area. It was kind of > hard to be sure, because I had a bad memory stick (I think) that was causing > me sporadic interrupts. Still, RH9 for me was prone to lockups. Are lockups > part of it's bad reputation? ---- the only lockups I recalled were upgrading from earlier RH version which made me toss away ~/.kde to clean up settings for KDE - not too certain that it was truly an RH 9 problem. Craig --------------------------------------------------- PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings: http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss