On Friday 14 May 2004 13:01, you wrote:
> On Fri, 14 May 2004 08:28:36 -0700, George Gambill
>
> <ggambill@computer-guidance.com> wrote:
> > Why RH 8 over RH 9?
>
> 9 was a bit rushed, a Friday build right before they decided on splitting
> to Enterprise and Fedora.
I've had a number of problems with RH9 in the stability area. It was kind of
hard to be sure, because I had a bad memory stick (I think) that was causing
me sporadic interrupts. Still, RH9 for me was prone to lockups. Are lockups
part of it's bad reputation?
Vaughn
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss