Re: CVS opinions

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Stephen P Rufle
Date:  
To: plug-discuss
Subject: Re: CVS opinions
I also use VSS and I would like to know what about it is evil. I ask
because I was looking into CVS also and it seemed that for our office we
would not gain much besides not having to pay for additional SourceOffsite
(remote client for VSS) licenses.

It may be that I am not using any of the bad features.

At 12:07 PM 2/23/2004, you wrote:
>Don Calfa said:
> > What is everyone's opinion on CVS? I've heard a lot of bad yet it's
> > still widely used.
>
>It is not "bad", it just is short on features compared to some of its
>propreitary counterparts. Many of these features you don't use until you
>get into more complex projects or uses of version control.
>
> > I have a situation where we are currently using Microsoft VSS which also
> > seems to be part of Server 2003 now. The developers 'hate' VSS and
> > want something else. Their history with other Source Control systems
> > also have poor reviews from them. None of them have used CVS so CVS
> > sounds attractive to them. The other attractive note about CVS is that
> > our Mac clients can now have source control.
>
>VSS is should be aptly named Virtual Son of Satan (VSS) as it is almost as
>much a spawn of the evil one as Power Point. Yes I was forced to use it
>for years and I do *know*.
>
> > I've been given a 'go' to investigate CVS, do some installations,
> > backups, catastrophic failures of server, restores, etc...
> > I'd like to see some opinions on it because I've never heard "CVS is
> > great!". Either we go ahead and convert all our VSS to CVS or just put
> > up with VSS.
>
>I strongly suggest you look at subversions[0]. It just released version
>1.0 this week. Also it has a great book[1] from red-bean just like CVS
>had. We have moved to it for GNU Enterprise and are really liking it. I
>have moved internal company work to it as well.
>
>There is also arch[2], but I don't recommend it at this time. In the
>future, it maybe the best, but right now its still immature.
>
>You can find a comparison[3] of source control management systems though
>it might be slightly stale.
>
>-Derek
>
>[0] http://subversion.tigris.org/
>[1] http://svnbook.red-bean.com/
>[2] http://www.gnu.org/software/gnu-arch/
>[3] http://better-scm.berlios.de/comparison/comparison.html
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------
>PLUG-discuss mailing list -
>To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
>http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


Stephen P Rufle

H:480-802-7173
Yahoo IM: stephen_rufle
AOL IM: stephen0rufle

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss