Cox and email revisited

On Saturday January 31 2004 11:24 pm, KevinO <kevin@kevino.org> wrote:
*v*Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 20:47:51 -0700
*v*From: KevinO <kevin@kevino.org>
*v*To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
*v*Subject: Re: Cox and email revisited
*v*Reply-To: plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
*v*
*v*-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
*v*Hash: SHA1

*v*Not that I intend to defend Cox...
*v*
*v*Your mailserver identifies itself as : azwebz ?
*v*
*v*As long as your IP stays the same, your might have better luck using a
valid, *v*full name that matches your IP address:
ip68-2-118-161.ph.ph.cox.net *v*
*v*People are getting more strict with their mail servers....
*v*
*v*- --
*v*KevinO
*v*
Kevin,
Are you saying that because the host name on my pc is different than my e=
mail=20
addy, I am in fact relaying?
My ip address only stays the same as long as cox lets it stay the same. I=
've=20
had three different ips in the last year. I think the blocking was done a=
t=20
the other end because I went to my internet based mail server and tried t=
o=20
email my client and got the same response.
My original rant was about cox's refusal to do anything for Linux users, =
yes=20
they were friendly but very unhelpful.
--=20
Augie Grayfox
grayfox78 at cox dot net

"When things go wrong, don't go with them" Anonymous