KevinO said:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> technomage wrote:
>> I've been on cox for a better part of almost 4 years. they are
>> substantially better than DSL (through Qworst) and their uptime is
>> nice (better than 99.992%).
>>
>
> You either live in an usually good neighborhood for Cox or your numbers
> are off.
>
> I started with Cox in July and had enough problems with their service
> that I started monitoring and logging my network connection.
>
> See: http://www.kevino.org/cox_status.txt
>
> I would be on DSL if I had the choice.
I agree with this, in that I run processes that go about every five
minutes. Every morning when I wake up there are between 4 and 5 time out
errors. Which means the service was unable to job 4 or 5 times over the
night. I also find 1 or 2 when I come home from work. Best I can tell I
have not seen but one or two "extended" outages (more than 10 minutes),
but it appears that the network is not highly stable.
I wish VDSL was available in my area. :(
-Derek
(text/plain)