On 29 Sep 2003, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-09-29 at 19:27, Bob Holtzman wrote:
> >
> > I would like to make one point: if you underexpose negative film, color or
> > black and white, you lose some shadow detail and *no* printer can save it.
> > I'd like to know how adjusting levels can compensate for this.
>
> The short answer is, it can't. The one advantage that you have in
> digital photography is that you don't have to make the transfer linear -
> you can do some pretty weird curves that would be impossible in film.
> But, you still loose data - you can never recreate data that you didn't
> get - it's a sad reality. About the only thing you can do is make it
> look better to the viewer of the picture.
Now *that* interests me! I just might break down and try it. It would be
nice if I had a few kilobucks for a digital 4x5 back...sigh.
> The other response is: if it looks better for most people, who cares? ;)
If I'm the "people" I care.
--
Bob Holtzman
"A man is a man who will fight with a sword,
Or tackle Mount Everest in snow;
But the bravest of all owns a '34 Ford,
Who will try for six thousand in low!"
Roger Huntington
(text/plain)