1. Some sites work with the www but not without, and vice versa. Depends on
the server and how it was registered.
2. Absolutely not.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Starke" <
meg@lilly.csoft.net>
To: "plug" <
plug-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us>
Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2003 12:40 PM
Subject: domain names, web standards, etc
> I guess I have a couple questions;
>
> 1. When advertising a domain name, why would I want to
> include the 'www' portion? I know the significance of 'www',
> but is it really necessary these days? I could see back in the days
> when the company had even traffic amongst it's ftp server, etc;
> but I fail to see why it is needed. From a recognition standpoint,
> I think http://mydomain.com is nicer than www.mydomain.com.
> Just curious.
>
> 2. Web develpment. I have yet to see a popular, and what most
> folks would consider "nice" site that meets w3c standards.
> Plug any of them into http://validator.w3.org/ and watch
> it throw up all over your screen. Is it possible to meet
> and pass the validator, yet keep the marketing dept. happy?
>
> --
> -Mike
>
> :wq!
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss