It seems to me that Postnuke is more stable-security oriented. PHPnuke
does have a ton of modules and blocks that I wish Postnuke would have.
One thing I like is the ability of PHPn to let the user choose their own
password. PostN is too confusing for the lay person. I have quite a
few users that don't know their passwords and the process is too
cumbersome to retreive it.
I also like the weather block for PHPn. The weather module for PostN is
fine but the ability to see it as a block is better I think.
Overall, I do like PostNuke better.
PLUGd@LuftHans.com wrote:
>Am 29. Jul, 2003 schwätzte Alexander Henry so:
>
>
>
>>Should I continue, or just ditch the whole thing and go with PostNuke?
>>
>>
>
>I don't know either well enough to make a technical suggestion. I am lead to
>believe that php-nuke has more problems than postnuke.
>
>For non-technical reasons I have suggested on both the PLUG list and the
>AZPHP list that we all stick to postnuke. Part of that is so that we, as a
>community, build more expertise in one CMS. Part of it is such that we, as a
>community, can put our efforts into fixing the problems we find in one CMS.
>The main reasons for choosing postnuke over the others were that we appeared
>to have many people using it and Carl was contributing to the project.
>
>ciao,
>
>der.hans
>
>
(text/plain)