It seems to me that Postnuke is more stable-security oriented.  PHPnuke 
does have a ton of modules and blocks that I wish Postnuke would have.


One thing I like is the ability of PHPn to let the user choose their own 
password.  PostN is too confusing for the lay person.  I have quite a 
few users that don't know their passwords and the process is too 
cumbersome to retreive it.
I also like the weather block for PHPn.  The weather module for PostN is 
fine but the ability to see it as a block is better I think.

Overall, I do like PostNuke better.

PLUGd@LuftHans.com wrote:

>Am 29. Jul, 2003 schwätzte Alexander Henry so:
>
>  
>
>>Should I continue, or just ditch the whole thing and go with PostNuke?
>>    
>>
>
>I don't know either well enough to make a technical suggestion. I am lead to
>believe that php-nuke has more problems than postnuke.
>
>For non-technical reasons I have suggested on both the PLUG list and the
>AZPHP list that we all stick to postnuke. Part of that is so that we, as a
>community, build more expertise in one CMS. Part of it is such that we, as a
>community, can put our efforts into fixing the problems we find in one CMS.
>The main reasons for choosing postnuke over the others were that we appeared
>to have many people using it and Carl was contributing to the project.
>
>ciao,
>
>der.hans
>  
>