John Olson wrote:
> www.fastq.com is worth a look. I know two people who have fastq and
> their uptime and bandwidth availability is good. Running servers is no
> problem, and they have various static IP packages. re: ports, all I
> know is that they blocked ports 137, 138 and 139 at one time.
Now those three ports I wouldn't mind having blocked...
;-)
- --
KevinO
Matz's Law:
A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking.