-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

John Olson wrote:
> www.fastq.com is worth a look.  I know two people who have fastq and
> their uptime and bandwidth availability is good.  Running servers is no
> problem, and they have various static IP packages.  re: ports, all I
> know is that they blocked ports 137, 138 and 139 at one time.

Now those three ports I wouldn't mind having blocked...


;-)

- --
KevinO

Matz's Law:
        A conclusion is the place where you got tired of thinking.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE9r95djBS1mMJB+bQRAjiqAKCf9rIgu0QbjPqIPgdpVQggPmi7fgCeKIJi
DjaYbCU1RxtzbmW2ysqmaIU=
=B/2w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----