Debian development branch - which do you use?

I have been following sarge now for a while. It seems more
up-to-date(tm) than woody and a little more reliable than sid. Sid for
the most part is ok. I have never not been able to boot. but sometimes
an application may start giving bugs and errors that were not there
before.

I would suggest sarge for a stable desktop that is up-to-date and sid
for a stable desktop that is bleeding edge and you may need to do some
basic maintance of on occasion.

Just my 2cents worth

On Fri, 2002-08-23 at 14:00, bob smith wrote:
> Hello all,
> I was just curious as to what branch those who use
> debian are currently tracking. From reading polls and
> other articles it seems that most people use sid (for
> dekstop purposes not server use). I've heard some
> horror stories though of people not being able to boot
> after something going horribly wrong while tracking
> sid. Thoughts?
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Finance - Get real-time stock quotes
> http://finance.yahoo.com
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--
Bill Warner
Unix/Linux Admin.
Direct Alliance Corporation

Company required stuff:

Contents are Direct Alliance Corporation Confidential

This message is for the designated recipient(s) only and contains
Direct Alliance Corporation privileged and confidential information.
If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately
and delete the original. Any other use of this email is prohibited.