Debian development branch - which do you use?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Shawn Rutledge
Date:  
Subject: Debian development branch - which do you use?
sid for me. I haven't had anything horrible happen. The worst problems
I had a while back were of the nature that if I upgraded one thing it
would try to force me to uninstall a bunch of stuff that I wanted to
keep, because those packages depended on an older version of some
library while the new thing depended on a newer version. So I point apt
at sid but only upgrade things selectively. At one point I had everything
upgraded, but not lately.

On Fri, Aug 23, 2002 at 02:00:17PM -0700, bob smith wrote:
> I was just curious as to what branch those who use
> debian are currently tracking. From reading polls and
> other articles it seems that most people use sid (for
> dekstop purposes not server use). I've heard some
> horror stories though of people not being able to boot
> after something going horribly wrong while tracking
> sid. Thoughts?


-- 
  _______                   Shawn T. Rutledge / KB7PWD  
 (_  | |_)                       http://ecloud.org  
 __) | | \________________________________________________________________