der.hans writes:
> Am 15. Jun, 2000 schwäzte Nathan Saper so:
>
> > You might also want to try out SCO. I haven't used it myself, but as
> > commercial *nix's go, I've heard that it's quite good. Most of the
>
> My experience (thank God it wasn't much) is that SCO sucks rocks. Config
> files were in wierd places compared to Linux, Solaris and SGI (which were
> the only boxen I knew at the time).
>
Wow. I'm really surprised to see that everyone hates SCO so much.
Previously, I'd heard and read a lot about its merits, and I was
seriously considering getting a free license for it. Now, I'll think
twice.
Thanks for all the input, guys.
> That was early in my career, so maybe I was just uninformed, but it seemed
> like a nightmare system...
>
> ciao,
>
> der.hans
> --
> # der.hans@LuftHans.com home.pages.de/~lufthans/ www.Opnix.com
> # Help Jerry Lewis stamp out M$...oops that's MDA - der.hans
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
- --
Primary Email (PGP):
natedog@well.com
Alternate Email (no PGP):
nsaper420@yahoo.com
PGP Key:
http://www.well.com/user/natedog/key.pgp
http://www.well.com/user/natedog/
AOL Instant Messenger: linuxfu
ICQ: 64619307
finger
natedog@well.com
(text/plain)