I have heard a lot of horror stories about the SCO when it comes
to security. They seem to be as bad as M$ when it comes to fixing
holes. No wonder they were partners for a while.
Nathan Saper wrote:
>
> > der.hans writes:
> > Am 15. Jun, 2000 schwäzte Nathan Saper so:
> >
> > > You might also want to try out SCO. I haven't used it myself, but as
> > > commercial *nix's go, I've heard that it's quite good. Most of the
> >
> > My experience (thank God it wasn't much) is that SCO sucks rocks. Config
> > files were in wierd places compared to Linux, Solaris and SGI (which were
> > the only boxen I knew at the time).
> >
>
> Wow. I'm really surprised to see that everyone hates SCO so much.
> Previously, I'd heard and read a lot about its merits, and I was
> seriously considering getting a free license for it. Now, I'll think
> twice.
>
> Thanks for all the input, guys.
>
> > That was early in my career, so maybe I was just uninformed, but it seemed
> > like a nightmare system...
> >
> > ciao,
> >
> > der.hans
> > --
> > # der.hans@LuftHans.com home.pages.de/~lufthans/ www.Opnix.com
> > # Help Jerry Lewis stamp out M$...oops that's MDA - der.hans
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
> >
>
> - --
> Primary Email (PGP): natedog@well.com
> Alternate Email (no PGP): nsaper420@yahoo.com
> PGP Key: http://www.well.com/user/natedog/key.pgp
> http://www.well.com/user/natedog/
> AOL Instant Messenger: linuxfu
> ICQ: 64619307
> finger natedog@well.com
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
--
"The questions is not if we are paranoid,
the question is if we are paranoid enough."
(text/plain)