-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 der.hans writes: > Am 15. Jun, 2000 schwäzte Nathan Saper so: > > > You might also want to try out SCO. I haven't used it myself, but as > > commercial *nix's go, I've heard that it's quite good. Most of the > > My experience (thank God it wasn't much) is that SCO sucks rocks. Config > files were in wierd places compared to Linux, Solaris and SGI (which were > the only boxen I knew at the time). > Wow. I'm really surprised to see that everyone hates SCO so much. Previously, I'd heard and read a lot about its merits, and I was seriously considering getting a free license for it. Now, I'll think twice. Thanks for all the input, guys. > That was early in my career, so maybe I was just uninformed, but it seemed > like a nightmare system... > > ciao, > > der.hans > -- > # der.hans@LuftHans.com home.pages.de/~lufthans/ www.Opnix.com > # Help Jerry Lewis stamp out M$...oops that's MDA - der.hans > > > _______________________________________________ > Plug-discuss mailing list - Plug-discuss@lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us > http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss > - -- Primary Email (PGP): natedog@well.com Alternate Email (no PGP): nsaper420@yahoo.com PGP Key: http://www.well.com/user/natedog/key.pgp http://www.well.com/user/natedog/ AOL Instant Messenger: linuxfu ICQ: 64619307 finger natedog@well.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.5 and Gnu Privacy Guard iD8DBQE5S/E6Uv7vZyB+cZkRAqYrAJwJ4ZUYjMRiso78XQ4iakarxfDPIgCdEXGt TzvlO5WDLnH14F6Y+KYqNPw= =rLUx -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----