Buzzwording is half the battle.
How do you expect to be an agile developer with high cross over
methodologies that provide synergy to your constituents if you aren't
willing to wipe down your server with a rag while providing authentic
technical support that benefits the whole of the individual....? Check mate
coders.
On Oct 27, 2016 14:50, "JD Austin" <
jd@twingeckos.com> wrote:
> Spot on Kevin.. I work with a guy like that who believes he's awesome
> because he can cobble together an inefficient Frankenstein. When you try
> to get him to explain why he's doing very inefficient operations like
> reloading 12 million records among 3 database tables EVERY DAY he talks in
> circles throwing out buzzwords wrongly but never really answering the
> question. I've gotten to the point that I ask only yes or no questions and
> when he goes on his verbal walkabout circling nothing. When he's done
> talking I simply ask 'Does that mean yes or no'.
> Good developers can think about problems and find a simple solution within
> the current constraints; bad developers overly obfuscate everything they do
> out of fear that we'll find out what we already know.
>
>
> -- JD Austin
> Voice: 480.269.4335 (480 2MY Geek)
> jd@twingeckos.com
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Kevin Fries <kevin@fries-biro.com> wrote:
>
>> Good coders understand how to code... That is you need to know HOW to
>> solve it... Then Google can help with the language. I am forever crossing
>> up languages, and Google is a godsend. But if I can't build the algorithm,
>> Google is of no use what-so-ever.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>> On Oct 27, 2016 3:23 PM, "Nathan England" <plug-discuss@nmecs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> I have met very few developers that I considered *good* developers that
>>> did not also have a google window open full time for questions.
>>>
>>> I think have of IT and development skills is just being able to google
>>> good and figure out the rest on your own.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> -- Nathan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 2016-10-27 08:10, Keith Smith wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think part of the key is only allowing those in, who show serious
>>>> potential and have done some self learning and show a true passion and
>>>> raw talent.
>>>>
>>>> It is a lot of hours. 720 - 1200 hours. And a lot of hands on which
>>>> is very beneficial. If the instructors are with the students most of
>>>> the time, giving them lots of guidance along the way, then maybe.
>>>> Just seems like a lot for 9 - 12 weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Not sure how much one can retain while drinking from a fire hose.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2016-10-27 07:43, Kevin Fries wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Insane! But if you read the article carefully, the students may be
>>>>> going for 2-3 months, but they are working 80-100 hrs a week.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really focused, structured it like a real job, go with 1 week
>>>>> sprints and a focus to learn A, B, and C in sprint/week 1, and D & E
>>>>> in sprint/week 2, 9-12 weeks is very do-able.
>>>>>
>>>>> If the boot camp had sponsors looking to hire, and the emphasis could
>>>>> be placed on those skills, a job 1 week after, at 2x a marketer's
>>>>> salary, is also very do-able.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think this idea is actually awesome.
>>>>>
>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 27, 2016 8:28 AM, "Keith Smith" <techlists@phpcoderusa.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I cannot imagine being able to teach someone how to be a web
>>>>>> developer in 9 - 12 weeks. I'd like to see the curriculum. Way too
>>>>>> much to know.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.businessinsider.com/guy-spent-11000-on-a-coding-b
>>>>> ootcamp-and-doubled-his-salary-2013-4
>>>>>
>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Keith Smith
>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss [2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Links:
>>>>> ------
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> http://www.businessinsider.com/guy-spent-11000-on-a-coding-b
>>>>> ootcamp-and-doubled-his-salary-2013-4
>>>>> [2] http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)