Re: To Tux or not to Tux (VM's)

In all of my experiences with KVM vs VBox it has always come down to "do
I need graphical performance?"

VBox is stellar when it comes to running a windows vm. I use modern.ie
daily for testing old IE versions and current versions and it flat out
sucks on kvm.

But when it comes to running vm's to host a clients web platform for
development KVM runs circles around VBox.

--Nathan


On 2016-04-19 14:03, Matt Graham wrote:
> On 2016-04-19 12:12, Wayne D wrote:
>> 1 vote each for VirtualBox and QEMU
>> Pros and Cons of each?
>
> QEMU emulates more architectures, like ARM, and it doesn't have any
> associations with Orrible. Its user interface is much less polished
> than Virtualbox's. I think that a normal user would probably be more
> comfortable with Virtualbox for that reason. Not sure how the
> performance of VMs differs between QEMU and Virtualbox though.
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss