So it doesn't really matter? I'll leave it then. Thanks for the help.
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Matt Graham <
mhgraham@crow202.org> wrote:
> On 2016-01-18 10:22, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> so no go on the sd cards then. what about thumb drives?
>>
>
> Putting non-FAT filesystems on USB disks works just fine. Most modern
> BIOSes will happily read and boot from an ISO9660 or UDF filesystem that's
> been dd'ed to a USB disk. An ext3 filesystem on a USB disk is totally
> feasible; my removable backup drives are ext3. The only real problem with
> using ext3 on a removable disk is that it's a pain to read that disk from
> an OS X machine. (Windows has ext2ifs, which allows Windows to treat an
> ext3 partition as just another drive.)
>
> I don't think that using ext3 on a flash-memory device would improve the
> device's lifetime though. Flash-memory devices almost always have
> wear-leveling built in at a level lower than the block device layer.
> Logical sector 1 may be mapped to physical sector 4567, and that mapping
> may change at any time. They had to do this, because the FAT is always in
> the same set of logical sectors, and is written to frequently.
>
>
> --
> Crow202 Blog: http://crow202.org/wordpress
> There is no Darkness in Eternity
> But only Light too dim for us to see.
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss