so no go on the sd cards then. what about thumb drives?
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Matt Graham <
mhgraham@crow202.org> wrote:
> On 2016-01-18 08:13, Michael Havens wrote:
>
>> ext3 at the time (99)) was superior to FAT because instead of
>> filling in the nearest open space with data when it is told to write
>> it scatters the data around on the disk. [...] I was
>> thinking it might be a good idea to format sd cards and thumb drives
>> to ext3/ext4 for this reason. Is that a sound idea or am I mistaken?
>>
>
> All the SD cards I've seen have FAT filesystems on them. The firmware in
> cameras almost certainly can't handle anything other than FAT. Android
> devices with SD slots probably expect FAT SD cards too, though they might
> be able to handle ext3.
>
> FAT actually makes sense for removable storage in many situations, because
> everything can understand it and UIDs/GIDs don't make sense for things that
> can be attached to different devices. I don't think it'll be possible to
> get rid of FAT for this reason. (And isn't there something called ExFAT
> that SD-using devices that take cards > 32G are required to support?)
>
>
> --
> Crow202 Blog: http://crow202.org/wordpress
> There is no Darkness in Eternity
> But only Light too dim for us to see.
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
--
:-)~MIKE~(-:
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)