Yes I am positive I was bridged at Startbucks..... I had a 192.168 address
while there, NAT only give 10.x.x.x addresses.
NAT works fine by the way.
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:19 AM, sean <
sean.a.ritzler@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you sure that it was bridged at Starbucks and not nat'd? What's the
> wifi chip? Not all have support for being bridged.
> On Feb 4, 2015 9:09 AM, "Michael Torres" <matorres124@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes it has both ...its a laptop. I hear what your saying but i have a
>> hard time wrapping my head around the fact that my wireless card will
>> communicate with starbucks router..but not mine. I am going to try and
>> reconfigure. My linksys router.... i have to factory reset it as i forgot
>> the password.
>> On Feb 4, 2015 8:36 AM, "Michael Butash" <michael@butash.net> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't use Cent ever, but if it's anything like Ubuntu, you get either
>>> a) network interfaces file ala sysconfig scripts in rh derivatives or b)
>>> NetworkManager controlling everything, but not both. If NM is running your
>>> stack, than it's likely ignoring those configurations as it contains all
>>> that in dbus and /etc/NetworkManager or like.
>>>
>>> If that is a wireless nic, I still think the wireless isn't giving you
>>> another address, and likely won't in all cases. Reason is typically
>>> wireless is meant to have a single client per security association. This
>>> is usually controllable to some aspect. There's a reason to prevent this -
>>> someone bridging their laptop to strong encrypted wireless, and
>>> representing it via old wep or like I can crack with my phone. Might work
>>> at home, but don't always expect that to work in more strict environments.
>>>
>>> Does the system have a wired nic on it? Have you tested with that?
>>>
>>> If you want to see the transaction, "tcpdump -i enp0s3 port 67 or port
>>> 68" that "outside" interface and see if you see the dhcp packet leave the
>>> wireless. If you get no response, your router/ap doesn't like another
>>> request. If not leaving that interface, it's a local system issue.
>>>
>>> Packets on the wire trump all, see if there are any.
>>>
>>> -mb
>>>
>>>
>>> On 02/04/2015 01:07 AM, Michael Torres wrote:
>>>
>>>> I didnt think that was the reason. just for the simple fact that I was
>>>> connected wirelessly at Starbucks......their router assigned me an IP
>>>> address using the enp0s3 file.
>>>>
>>>> anyways, I removed the device and reinstalled, still the same thing.
>>>> I still think its a setting in my router or perhaps Windows strikes again
>>>> and there is something in the Network Manager that I dont understand.
>>>>
>>>> How frustrating.....anyways, thanks for the help, if you think of
>>>> anything else, please let me know.
>>>>
>>>> Going to bed now..
>>>>
>>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------
>>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------
>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)