Yes I am positive I was bridged at Startbucks..... I had a 192.168 address while there, NAT only give 10.x.x.x addresses. NAT works fine by the way. On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:19 AM, sean wrote: > Are you sure that it was bridged at Starbucks and not nat'd? What's the > wifi chip? Not all have support for being bridged. > On Feb 4, 2015 9:09 AM, "Michael Torres" wrote: > >> Yes it has both ...its a laptop. I hear what your saying but i have a >> hard time wrapping my head around the fact that my wireless card will >> communicate with starbucks router..but not mine. I am going to try and >> reconfigure. My linksys router.... i have to factory reset it as i forgot >> the password. >> On Feb 4, 2015 8:36 AM, "Michael Butash" wrote: >> >>> I don't use Cent ever, but if it's anything like Ubuntu, you get either >>> a) network interfaces file ala sysconfig scripts in rh derivatives or b) >>> NetworkManager controlling everything, but not both. If NM is running your >>> stack, than it's likely ignoring those configurations as it contains all >>> that in dbus and /etc/NetworkManager or like. >>> >>> If that is a wireless nic, I still think the wireless isn't giving you >>> another address, and likely won't in all cases. Reason is typically >>> wireless is meant to have a single client per security association. This >>> is usually controllable to some aspect. There's a reason to prevent this - >>> someone bridging their laptop to strong encrypted wireless, and >>> representing it via old wep or like I can crack with my phone. Might work >>> at home, but don't always expect that to work in more strict environments. >>> >>> Does the system have a wired nic on it? Have you tested with that? >>> >>> If you want to see the transaction, "tcpdump -i enp0s3 port 67 or port >>> 68" that "outside" interface and see if you see the dhcp packet leave the >>> wireless. If you get no response, your router/ap doesn't like another >>> request. If not leaving that interface, it's a local system issue. >>> >>> Packets on the wire trump all, see if there are any. >>> >>> -mb >>> >>> >>> On 02/04/2015 01:07 AM, Michael Torres wrote: >>> >>>> I didnt think that was the reason. just for the simple fact that I was >>>> connected wirelessly at Starbucks......their router assigned me an IP >>>> address using the enp0s3 file. >>>> >>>> anyways, I removed the device and reinstalled, still the same thing. >>>> I still think its a setting in my router or perhaps Windows strikes again >>>> and there is something in the Network Manager that I dont understand. >>>> >>>> How frustrating.....anyways, thanks for the help, if you think of >>>> anything else, please let me know. >>>> >>>> Going to bed now.. >>>> >>>> >>> --------------------------------------------------- >>> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >>> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >>> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >>> >> >> --------------------------------------------------- >> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org >> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: >> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >> > > --------------------------------------------------- > PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.phxlinux.org > To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings: > http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss >