Re: 32bit vs 64bit Linux

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Stephen Rufle
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
CC: keith smith
Subject: Re: 32bit vs 64bit Linux
My only compatibly issue was getting the VPN tunnel that my job uses to
work in 64 bit.
Juniper network-connect software on Ubuntu not sure what version, but it
was around 2011. My advice is to do a 64 bit install and then do a tests
with your personal list of high priority software.

On 5/31/13 9:28 AM, keith smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Even though I have 64bit hardware I always install the 32bit version
> of Linux. I do so because of the past discussions on this list that
> made me believe the 32bit OS was better because 64bit caching is
> actually slower due to the requirement that the cache be filled to a
> certain point before it is moved. I think I recall something about
> the amount of RAM having some effect here also.
>
> Using a 32bit version over a 64bit version seems counter intuitive,
> however that is what I have taken away from these conversations about
> 32bit vs 64bit Linux.
>
> I'm using CentOS 6.x on a LAMP server that gets a low amount of
> traffic. However I may make the jump to Linux on my desktop this
> summer. (this will be my 3rd attempt to become M$ free except one VM
> so I can use IE for testing) I think all of my hardware is 64bit.
>
> So that begs the question, is 32bit better than 64bit or do I not
> understand the issue?
>
> Thank you for your feedback.
>
> Keith
>
> ------------------------
> Keith Smith
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.phxlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss