As I said, I'm just learning about JPEG 2000 myself.
Quoting from the archival storage article
mentioned below:
"As an improvement to the 1992
JPEG standard, JPEG 2000 provides both lossy and lossless
compression. Lossless compression allows the exact original data
to be reconstructed from the compressed data. And yet, lossless
compression typically achieves 50% to 60% reduction in file size
compared with source files—without sacrificing resolution quality
in the conversion! For this reason, among others, JPEG 2000 is
becoming popular in the digital preservation industry. File
extensions for JPEG 2000 files are .jp2 and .j2k. [Newer additions
to the JPEG 2000 standard use file extensions .jpf & .jpx. See
also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/JPEG_2000.]
PNG (Portable Network Graphics) is another ISO standard file
format that provides lossless data compression. In some cases,
such as images having areas with many pixels of the same color,
PNG is even more space efficient than JPEG 2000. However, JPEG
2000 is more error resilient than PNG and is gaining a foothold
in the digital preservation industry; hence the author’s focus
on JPEG 2000 for general use.
JPEG 2000 software for Windows is identified in the following
incomplete list of products—
Adobe Acrobat and Adobe Photoshop
FastStone Image Viewer (free for personal use)
XnView [and IrfanView] (free for personal use)
ACDSee Photo Editor
Corel PaintShop Photo Pro"
There is some JPEG 2000 software (mostly plugins) available for
Linux, but it seems to be slow in coming.
-mj-
Eric Shubert wrote:
On
09/16/2011 12:54 PM, Mark Jarvis wrote:
I've just recently found out about a company with CD/DVD
media/drives
which don't use dye layer but actually melt a pit in the media.
Here's
the company site
http://millenniata.com/ and a good article
about
archival storage in general
http://goo.gl/vDwAZ. The drives
aren't ready
to ship and I was going to pre-order one, but decided to let
someone
else be the early adopter and have the fun with the low s/n
machines.
I also had somehow missed or ignored information about JPEG 2000
files,
which I should have been using instead of .jpg for my personal
storage.
For a while it looks like .jpg & .tif are still the lingua
franca for
image exchange, however.
__
<
http://goo.gl/vDwAZ>
Care to enlighten us about JPEG 2000 ?
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss