Re: ext? as fat or ntfs?

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Lisa Kachold
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: ext? as fat or ntfs?
On 7/20/09, der.hans <> wrote:
> Am 20. Jul, 2009 schwätzte Bryan O'Neal so:
>
>> Yes, but you would have to modify their project. I am going out on a limn
>> here but I am guessing I am the only hard core windows admin on the list.
>
> Possibly. In the end I think we need to find some other people to do this.
> Maybe get the samba team interested by billing it as a live samba drive or
> something.
>
>> Lisa probably knows the internal security better then I and we may have a
>> few programmers willing to work on it, but it is likely we can get
>> "layered"
>> fs driver without having admin access. You will have to use your own GUI
>> to
>> interact with the drive, not explorer, but it can be done.
>
> Cool to hear that it's probably possible without admin privs even if it's
> a pain.
>
>> But, you have to ask what your target is. Will 70% or more of the users in
>> question have access to admin level privileges? If so why not just
>> include
>> the real FS drivers on a FAT16 partition?
>
> I'm beginning to think we need to start off with something that requires
> admin privs, but not a reboot.
>
> After that we can work on a solution that doesn't require admin privs.
>
> Thanks for the responses.
>
> ciao,
>
> der.hans


That's already been done:
http://www.desktoplinux.com/news/NS4980952387.html

--
http://linuxgazette.net/164/kachold.html
(623)239-3392
(503)754-4452 www.obnosis.com
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss