Check out::
http://tombarta.wordpress.com/
*Great stuff,
*GCC Compiler-Defined
Macros<
http://tombarta.wordpress.com/2008/08/09/gcc-compiler-defined-macros/>
* *
(Search forward for the "instanti" and find the reference that matches your
situation?)
For instance:
__FILE__, __LINE__, __func__, __PRETTY_FUNCTION__Diagnostics for “where am
I?” Note that the first three are standard and provided by any compiler,
__PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is a GCC-ism and contains the “decorated name”, which
includes all of the arguments and template instantiations. The only good
reason I’ve heard to use __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ is the template instantiation
inclusion (e.g. “this problem happens with std::vector<MyCrappyType>, and
not with just any vector type).
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Jerry Davis <
jdawgaz@cox.net> wrote:
> and now for something completely off topic ... other than rules for posting
> and
> such.
>
> I am just now having to learn c++ : I haven't done any C work since the
> middle 80's. I am being forced to move from Rational clearcase and
> clearquest
> to svn and teamtrack. TeamTrack is UGLY, don't get me started. But suffice
> it
> to say, that the teamtrack API is written in C++. At least this part runs
> on
> linux.
>
> I have the following situation:
>
> I have a source file, which has a bunch of #includes which are .h files of
> the
> other classes used. I have full source. IOW, I can see in the source/
> directory
> every .h and .C file of all the #includes.
>
> I use g++ to compile, and I compile with -g to make it debuggable with gdb.
> I
> am also new to gdb, but am learning.
>
> I hope you are with me so far.
>
> In my current source file, I instantiate an object of a class from another
> source file, which is #included in my current source file. When I use gdb,
> I
> can step into my current sources' functions and step through every line and
> print out variables etc. -- everything you would expect to do in a
> debugger,
> BUT, when I get to the method call of the other class object, I can do
> nothing
> but step OVER it.
>
> How do I compile it such that I can step INTO the other objects' method?
> and
> then step line by line in it? or do I have that capability already, and
> need to
> use some other command in gdb that I don't know about?
>
> I hope this is clear.
>
>
> --
> Hobbit Name: Pimpernel Loamsdown
> Registered Linux User: 275424
> K7AZJ
>
> This email's Fortune:
> Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't
> like solitary confinement.
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
--
www.obnosis.com (503)754-4452
"Contradictions do not exist." A. Rand
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)