RE: ESXi vs. XEN - 10 Reasons to Play

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
+ (text/html)
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Lisa Kachold
Date:  
To: plug-discuss
Old-Topics: Re: ESXi vs. XEN
Subject: RE: ESXi vs. XEN - 10 Reasons to Play

More reasons to play around with both VMware ESXi (free) [other than it looks suite on your resume] AND XEN (for systems you can afford to keep):

http://www.linux.com/feature/59397 Setting Up VMWare Player on Linux

http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/ VMWare Images


http://www.seepurity.com/?page_id=28 Open Source Security Tools

http://vmplanet.net/ Including the Fedora 10 Preview & Ubuntu 8.10

http://www.thoughtpolice.co.uk/vmware/ Various Useful Images

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/3779546/Mac_OS_X_x86_VMWare_Image Mac of Course

http://www.haiku-os.org/downloads Haiku-Os

http://newappsdba.blogspot.com/2008/04/part-1-setting-up-vmware-and-linux-for.html Oracle RAC 10g Installation (soo fun!)

http://www.mininova.org/tor/367722 Endian Firewall TurnKey Distro


https://legroom.net/2007/08/05/how-mount-vmware-disk-images-under-linux Mount VMWare in Linux to Add Remove Files [accept the cert - it's safe!]



Obnosis.com | http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Citations:obnosis |
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=obnosis (503)754-4452

> Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 12:16:42 -0800
> From:
> To:
> Subject: Re: ESXi vs. XEN
>
> > Xen requires hardware integration on both the host and the client. VMWare does not
> > require that.
>
> Actually, Xen and VMWare can both do full virtualization (hypervisor
> unaware guests). Xen also does paravirtualization (hypervisor aware
> guests). VMWare has more commercial tools, but they all run on windows
> as of today. Xen has (imho) faster to implement tools, but they aren't
> as polished as VMWare.
>
> I think that for the less linux saavy, VMWare is the way to get
> started. If you are well versed with making and restoring linux disk
> images and networking, then Xen is for you. They are both great, but
> require lots of R&D (tinkering) to get what you want.
>
> Don't pay attention to marketing claims of performance or scalability.
> The truth is that if you have a high-resource/load host, it's going to
> be the same on a hypervisor. The way to virtualize is to combine many
> (5-15) low-load hosts onto one hypervisor host.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> ; ) .randy
>
>
>
> --
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
>
>
> NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail is confidential and
> is for the use only of the intended recipient. If you are not the
> intended recipient, any disclosure, copy, distribution or other use of
> this information is prohibited. If you have received this
> communication in error please notify us immediately by telephone and
> delete or discard this message immediately.
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list -
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss


_________________________________________________________________
Windows Live Hotmail now works up to 70% faster.
http://windowslive.com/Explore/Hotmail?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_WL_hotmail_acq_faster_112008---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss