I don't understand your comment. Considering some of my other posts on this
topic, I thought it was rather neutral :) . Its nice to have a black and
white rule. However, there are instances where either party could be taken
advantage of. (if a cyclist wants a new bike, they throw it in front of a
car and claim being hit... if the cyclist is killed, there is an incentive
(although sadistic imo) to not report the accident. I only mentioned it
because its a different, interesting (imo) perspective on the bike/car
relationship.
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 3:37 PM, Donn <
dlshumway@gmail.com> wrote:
> You say that like it's a good thing?
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 10:57 AM, Eric Cope <eric.cope@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On a side note, in the Netherlands, if a driver hits a bicyclist,
>> regardless of reason, the driver is 100% at fault. A bicyclist could wait
>> for a car to come down a road, then throw themselves in front of the car,
>> and the car is (criminally) at fault.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>
> --
> Donn
> There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
> -- Dave Barry
>
> ---------------------------------------------------
> PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
> http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
>
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)