Re: QT compiled size

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Chris Gehlker
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: QT compiled size

On Nov 29, 2007, at 10:09 AM, Dan Lund wrote:

> The Linux version uses Xlib style calls on the backend, and doesn't do
> anything window manager'ish. It's just X, no dependence on anything
> other than X.


I'm totally confused. My understanding is that QT is a pretty high
level GUI library that indeed depends only on X in the Linux version.
If that's true it must do something window managerish i.e. it must
contain all the functionality that is included in a GUI but is not
included in a basic window server. On OS X it does interface with a
window manager so it would need less functionality and hence be
smaller. What am I missing.
>
>
> What does Ruby & Python have to do with QT?


Ruby and Python don't have built in GUIs ala Java. Programmers who
want to write portable GUI apps in these languages need to bind to a
GUI library. A typical Ruby installation will have bindings for QT,
Tcl/Tk and a few others.
--
And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who
could not hear the music.
-Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche, philosopher (1844-1900)

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss