moin moin,
There is a performance hit for using modules rather than having the
functionality built in to the kernel. Is that a recurring penalty once the
module has been loaded? In other words, does the kernel have to do
something extra each time it uses a fx() from a module?
Does having a whole bunch of loaded modules cause a performance hit
because some module lookup table gets huge or for some other reason?
Does having unused modules that are available on the file system cause
a performance hit for the kernel? Module dependencies are stored on disk
and the modules aren't being used, so I think the downside would only be
that they use more disk space. Maybe the size of resources like a module
lookup table are determined at compile time such that having more modules
staticly dedicates more resources to handling them...
I realize this performance hits might be slight under most circumstances.
I want to understand whether or not they exist at all and then learn if
there are conditions where they are significant enough to be an issue.
ciao,
der.hans
--
# https://www.LuftHans.com/ http://www.CiscoLearning.org/
# I've got a photographic memory,
# but I'm lousy photographer. - der.hans
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - PLUG-discuss@lists.plug.phoenix.az.us
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change your mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss
(text/plain)