Re: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: George Toft
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin
All of the shells are on /usr/bin, and symlinked from /bin

This makes it exceedingly difficult to boot when /usr is gone :)

George Toft, CISSP, MSIS
My IT Department
www.myITaz.com
480-544-1067

Confidential data protection experts for the financial industry.


Darrin Chandler wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:21:57AM -0700, George Toft wrote:
>
>>>Traditionally, and still in spirit. Nothing in /bin and /sbin should
>>>depend on /usr being mounted. If it does, then it's broken, IMHO.
>>>
>>
>>Solaris is broken (by this definition). Solaris will not boot if /usr
>>is unavailable. A certain bank here in town found that out the hard
>>way. The I found it out also when I decided to move the /usr partition.
>>Yup, box no boot with no /usr. Solaris 8, btw.
>
>
> Well, it's hard to put *everything* on the root partition. But you
> should be able to boot single-user mode without /usr and have a basic
> functionality (some shells, fsck, mount, an editor or two, etc.) for
> diagnostics, repair, and configuration.
>

---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list -
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss