Re: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin

Top Page
Attachments:
Message as email
+ (text/plain)
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Darrin Chandler
Date:  
To: Main PLUG discussion list
Subject: Re: /usr/local/bin vs /usr/local/sbin
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 12:21:57AM -0700, George Toft wrote:
>
> >Traditionally, and still in spirit. Nothing in /bin and /sbin should
> >depend on /usr being mounted. If it does, then it's broken, IMHO.
> >
>
> Solaris is broken (by this definition). Solaris will not boot if /usr
> is unavailable. A certain bank here in town found that out the hard
> way. The I found it out also when I decided to move the /usr partition.
> Yup, box no boot with no /usr. Solaris 8, btw.


Well, it's hard to put *everything* on the root partition. But you
should be able to boot single-user mode without /usr and have a basic
functionality (some shells, fsck, mount, an editor or two, etc.) for
diagnostics, repair, and configuration.

-- 
Darrin Chandler            |  Phoenix BSD Users Group
   |  http://bsd.phoenix.az.us/
http://www.stilyagin.com/  |
---------------------------------------------------
PLUG-discuss mailing list - 
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or to change  you mail settings:
http://lists.PLUG.phoenix.az.us/mailman/listinfo/plug-discuss